Wide shot of Parliament with a pale blue sky

Cross sector groups urge PM to accept REUL Bill amendments at ping pong

A wide group of organisations have written to the prime minister and business and environment secretaries urging compromise over amendments to the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill to strengthen parliamentary scrutiny and include an environmental safeguard. The letter said:

Dear Prime Minister and Secretaries of State

We are writing to urge you to accept the amendments proposed by crossbenchers Lord Anderson of Ipswich, Lord Hope of Craighead and Lord Krebs to the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill.

As representatives of consumers, businesses, lawyers, trade unions, environmental groups and civil society, we welcome the recent changes made to make retention rather than revocation of laws the default approach. This will provide businesses and the public with greater certainty over which laws and protections will continue to apply over the coming years.

We support the efforts of crossbench peers, however, in seeking to make a small number of sensible improvements to areas of the bill that have long caused significant concern among stakeholders.

As it stands, the bill would allow future ministers, of this government or the next, to change or remove vital protections for consumers, workers or the environment with extremely limited parliamentary or public scrutiny. As a government determined to restore national sovereignty to the Westminster parliament after EU Exit, we would hope that you would find a way to support the proposals of Lord Hope and Lord Anderson to offer parliament more of a say over potential changes to important laws.

The approach proposed by Lord Krebs would help to underscore this government’s commitment to the environment by adding a safeguard for existing protections.

Ministers have claimed that including such a safeguard in the bill is unnecessary as the government is determined to uphold existing standards. Yet this government’s word does not hold for the next administration, unless that commitment is in law. Therefore, if current ministers are determined to protect existing standards, they should be able to put their pledge into the bill via the principles set out in Lord Krebs’ amendment.

These changes do not change the fundamental thrust of the bill and would offer greater certainty to businesses, workers and civil society as they look to work with government on future UK regulation.

As the bill nears its conclusion, we urge you to include these sensible changes in the bill.


Shaun Spiers, Chair, Greener UK

Signe Norberg, Interim Executive Director, Aldersgate Group

Victoria Marks, Director, Anti Trafficking and Labour Exploitation Unit (ATLEU)

Dr Anna Watson, Director of Policy and Advocacy, CHEM Trust

Rosalind Stevens, Project Manager, Civil Society Alliance

Clare Moody, Co-CEO, Equally Ours

Kate Roberts, Head of Policy, Focus on Labour Exploitation

Tim Nelson, CEO, Hope for Justice

Lubna Shuja, President, The Law Society

Sean Kelly, Interim Chief Executive, Northern Ireland Environment Link

Josie Cohen, Head of Policy and Campaigns, PAN UK

Beccy Speight, CEO, The RSPB

Dan Paris, Advocacy Manager, Scottish Environment Link

Kath Dalmeny, Chief Executive Officer, Sustain: the alliance for better food and farming

Paul Nowak, General Secretary, The TUC

Phoebe Clay and Emma Rose, Co-Directors, Unchecked UK

Charles Whitmore, Project Coordinator, Wales Civil Society Forum

Natalie Zhivkova, Policy and Insights Manager, Wales Council for Voluntary Action

Karen Whitfield, Co-Director, Wales Environment Link